Not very long ago data centers were massive with numerous servers placed on racks and each server hosting a single application. It was the picture in the era of distributed computing that evolved from the data center, comprising of large mainframe and housed inside a room where punched cards would be used for data entry. Distributed computing continues to be used, but not much in the way described here. Data centers have undergone a sea change, and they have slimmed down remarkably. The massive infrastructure that once used to be the hallmark of data centers has vanished into the blue. Today, in any physical data center, you will hardly find a few servers.
If you are wondering what caused this significant makeover of data centers, then you must know that it has happened due to Virtualization. The incredible disappearing act of the infrastructure from the data center premises is the result of Virtualization that has drastically brought down the number of physical servers to a minimum. Data centers that had begun as huge monsters have now become dwarfs with a few desktops scattered here and there in a vast space. So, how do data centers still maintain operations? The infrastructure might have become invisible and not seen anywhere on the premise, but it has shifted its location and found a place in the cloud. The invisible infrastructure is even more powerful and robust than what it used to be on the ground earlier, and the new incarnation is earning all kudos from IT managers who applaud the act whole-heartedly.
More emphasis on the cloud
Taking advantage of Virtualization, more and more companies are placing their backup and disaster recovery applications in the cloud. The initial success has encouraged these companies so much that they are eager to use the cloud for other applications too. Going by the trend, the day may not be far when most businesses would repose more faith in the cloud and migrate more applications there while only a few physical data centers on the ground would continue the legacy. Since shifting 100% workloads to the cloud is not practicable, dwarfed physical centers would continue to exist. How the change is going to affect data recovery NJ and how you should prepare to handle disaster recovery in future would become apparent upon reading this article.
The erstwhile DR models
The task of maintaining business continuity by implementing Disaster Recovery (DR) plan used to depend on the traditional primary site and recovery site concept. The recovery site used to be a duplicate of the primary site that needed protection against disaster and comprised of a massive infrastructure of servers, software systems of the core data center, storage and networking. The recovery site was always on the standby to support the primary site in case of any work stoppage. The active-passive Disaster Recovery model or active-active Disaster Recovery model are the two options available. The former model involved a disaster recovery site that served the purpose of test and development when not in disaster recovery mode, while the latter model allowed distribution of workload on both sites. Both models involved substantial capital expenditure and management cost.
Resource consolidation lowers cost
Just imagine how much expenses can be reduced when you can do away with creating the infrastructure because it is available readymade in the cloud. In the process, you are consolidating your resources and enjoying much better service from companies like American Tech Pros that have set their own standard in Cloud Disaster recovery. What you pay for the service is far lower than what you would have spent in creating the infrastructure and maintaining it. The cloud has brought the framework for Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity within reach of many small businesses that cannot afford it on their own. Now, it neither requires owning infrastructure nor any financial responsibility for it because you pay only for the services that you avail. That is where you can generate the cost benefits for which the cloud is so attractive.
Hybrid Cloud is the preferred choice
For many companies, the movement to the cloud would be a gradual process because they have already invested in space, equipment, and hardware for physical data centers. The most preferred model would be the combination of part cloud and part data center, which could bridge the gap between the hybrid architecture of the cloud and the legacy architecture. This model gives the opportunity for managing data onsite as well as offsite with focus on performing a function like content indexing that provides resiliency. When you build resilience into the architecture, it always remains on and reduces the need for data recovery as users can manage data even outside the data centers.
Let data be everywhere
The location of data is becoming irrelevant because, with tools to manage data onsite as well as offsite, the divide between physical and offsite cloud location of data is becoming more and more blurred. The convenience and flexibility in managing data points to the fact that the aspects of Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity is moving towards a future that does away with the concept of mirroring sites at a physical level that existed in the form of recovery site and primary site. Against this backdrop, it makes enough sense to include more infrastructures into the cloud architecture for Disaster Recovery and backup. The low cost of cloud makes it attractive while it gives more comfort to users with much better data protection.
If you are in two minds about whether to tread the old path of onsite data storage or ultimately migrate to the cloud, the advice from the experts at American Tech Pros is to use both old and new things, but whatever you are doing must be done in new ways.
For more information and support in cloud disaster recovery services as well as cyber security and an array of managed IT services, log on to https://americantechpros.com/ to seek the most appropriate solutions for your business.